A 360 review form is a multi-source feedback tool that gathers input on an employee’s performance from their manager, peers, direct reports, and sometimes even clients. It provides a holistic view of the employee’s impact on the organization.
The 360 review form PDF helps organizations identify blind spots and leadership effectiveness. It allows employees to understand how they are perceived by different stakeholders, fostering better teamwork and self-improvement. This free 360 review template is particularly useful for leadership development. Because anonymity is crucial for honest feedback, utilizing secure digital links sent via recruitment texting (internal use) can help ensure high response rates while protecting the identity of the raters.
This 360 review form template free includes fields for various rater types. These components ensure a balanced perspective across different working relationships.
Collecting 360 feedback via email or paper is administratively burdensome and threatens anonymity. These manual methods often result in vague feedback because raters fear their handwriting or email address will be recognized.
Digitizing 360 review forms allows HR teams to automate the distribution and anonymization of feedback. Digital forms ensure that reports are aggregated automatically, presenting the employee with trends rather than raw data.
Emitrr enables HR teams to manage complex multi-rater workflows. Integrating with AI chatbot for recruiting (adapted for internal HR support) allows raters to ask questions about the process or confidentiality guarantees before submitting.
By centralizing the data, Emitrr helps HR teams generate comprehensive 360 reports with a single click. With secure, anonymous submission options, Emitrr supports a culture of honest, constructive feedback that drives real professional growth.
Yes, typically the feedback is aggregated so the recipient cannot attribute specific comments to specific individuals (except perhaps the manager).
It is generally recommended to use 360s for development purposes only, not for pay or promotion, to prevent “rating trading.”
Participation is usually mandatory for the recipient, but being a rater for someone else is often voluntary.
Often the employee nominates a list of peers, which is then approved by their manager to ensure a fair mix.